Abstract management
Collect submissions the committee can actually work with
A call for papers is not a web form with an attachment. Eventumbot treats each abstract as a record: authors, topics, files, revisions and status, ready for review and later for the programme.
Open a call that matches the science, not a generic intake
Define tracks, topic codes, presentation types and mandatory files before authors arrive. Instructions live next to the form so the first version you receive is closer to what the committee can judge.
Structured topics
Map submissions onto the scientific taxonomy the programme will use.
Author accounts
Corresponding authors see status, co-authors and what is still missing.
Complete records
Titles, affiliations, statements and files stay together when review starts.
After the deadline, the work is still in one place
Withdrawals, late corrections the chair allows, and incomplete files are handled against the same record the reviewers will see. Nothing has to be rebuilt in a spreadsheet to start assignment.
Intake is the start of the programme, not a silo
Accepted abstracts become sessions. Presenting authors become programme entries and, when you use registration, people who still need a ticket. Peer review and the conference programme consume the same objects rather than an exported spreadsheet.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. Symposia, posters, late-breaking work and invited sessions can be separate calls with shared author accounts.
Corresponding authors can see completeness, submit revisions when you allow them, and later see decision status according to the rules you set.
Solutions
Book a demo
Eventumbot abstract management: structured calls, author dashboards, file rules and complete submission records for academic conferences.